Top Cabinet Office official to give evidence to MPs about Peter Mandelson’s vetting – UK politics live
Published by WarSignal Editorial · Last updated
Permanent secretary, Cat Little, to give evidence to foreign affairs committee as pressure increases on Keir Starmer Good morning. As Kiran Stacey , Pippa Crerar and Jessica Elgot report in the Guardian’s splash, “Keir Starmer is looking increasingly isolated over his handling of the Peter Mandelson scandal with divisions emerging in cabinet over his decision to sack the Foreign Office civil servant Olly Robbins.” And this morning the saga continues, with Cat Little , permanent secretary at the Cabinet Office, giving evidence to the Commons foreign affairs committee about the Peter Mandelson vetting controversy. Cat set out that the vetting process involved UKSV in the Cabinet Office producing a vetting file which included a recommendation on whether DV should be granted, which was then passed to the sponsor department, in this case FCDO.
As part of the humble address process, that file had been shared with Cat. On reviewing the file she had therefore learned that the recommendation from the vetting officer had been that DV should not be granted to Peter Mandelson. There is some discretion for departments to proceed with clearance and the FCDO had exercised it in this case, granting Mandelson vetting clearance. Cat had not seen the audit trail for this decision so we did not yet know on what basis the decision had been taken, contrary to the recommendation. Continue reading...
Verification Status
unverified — Unverified — single source, not yet confirmed This event has been confirmed by 1 independent sources.
Location
Sources (1)
About This Report
This report is generated by WarSignal's multi-source intelligence pipeline. Information is collected from wire services, OSINT channels, and partner APIs, then clustered, verified, and published with editorial oversight. Source attribution and verification status are displayed for full transparency. For our complete methodology, visit our Sources & Methodology page.