US must drop ‘hegemon’ mindset for Ukraine peace – Jeffrey Sachs
Published by WarSignal Editorial · Last updated
Resolving the conflict requires Washington to recognize Russia’s security interests and the realities of a multipolar world, Jeffrey Sachs has told RT US backroom diplomacy on Ukraine cannot achieve peace without Washington accepting that it is no longer the world’s sole superpower, economist and public policy scholar Jeffrey Sachs has told RT. The comments follow separate closed-door talks held by US special envoy Steve Witkoff and President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow and Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky in Kiev over the weekend. Details of the proposals exchanged during the meetings have not been made public. “The US still has a grandiose idea that it is the world’s hegemon and the sole superpower, and it is not. Clearly, we are in a multi-polar world,” Sachs told RT in an exclusive interview on Sunday.
Sachs argued that a peace settlement requires taking Russia’s security interests into account and abandoning the expansionist foreign policy the US has pursued for more than 30 years. Read more Trump envoy ‘feels good’ about Russia-Ukraine peace talks “It seems to be psychologically very difficult” for Washington to openly accept that “basic reality,” he argued, saying this is why it resorts to “backroom negotiations” and secrecy that ultimately produce no tangible results. Sachs also described the situation in Ukraine as an “endgame situation,” arguing that Kiev is in a desperate position militarily, socially, and politically. Watch the exclusive interview with economist Jeffrey Sachs in full below.
Verification Status
unverified — Unverified — single source, not yet confirmed This event has been confirmed by 1 independent sources.
Location
Sources (1)
About This Report
This report is generated by WarSignal's multi-source intelligence pipeline. Information is collected from wire services, OSINT channels, and partner APIs, then clustered, verified, and published with editorial oversight. Source attribution and verification status are displayed for full transparency. For our complete methodology, visit our Sources & Methodology page.